Top 15 Drag & Drop Agent Builder Tools for 2026

author-img
by Emily Winks, Data governance expert at Atlan.Last Updated on: February 10th, 2026 | 18 min read

Quick answer: What are drag & drop agent builder tools?

Drag & drop agent builder tools are visual environments for designing, connecting, and running AI agents without low-level coding. They let teams compose LLM calls, tools, APIs, memory, and human approvals into workflows using blocks and connectors, then connect those agents to apps and data with integrations, governance, and monitoring.

  • Visual flow design: Canvas or graph editors for prompts, tools, branching logic, and retries.
  • Connectors and tools: Prebuilt integrations to SaaS apps, databases, vector stores, and internal APIs.
  • State and memory: Shared context between steps, conversation history, and working memory across tasks.
  • Testing and observability: Sandboxes, logs, traces, and guardrails to keep agents safe and predictable.
  • Governance: Many teams pair builders with governed context platforms like Atlan to keep data, policies, and workflows under control across agents and tools.

Below: how we evaluated, top 15 tools.

Assess Your Context Readiness →Take Atlan Product Tour

How we evaluated drag & drop agent builders

Choosing an agent builder is not just about how pretty the canvas looks.
In 2026, most teams care about usability, integration depth, governance, and how well a tool survives real-world scale.
We used the criteria below, and you can reuse them as a checklist in your own selection process.

1. Usability for mixed technical audiences


Most successful agent programs involve engineers, data teams, and domain experts.
Strong tools give non-developers enough visual control while still letting engineers plug in custom code where needed.
Look for role-based views, inline documentation, and collaboration features like comments or change history.

Modern data workspaces such as Atlan can complement this by giving each persona the same governed context, glossary, and lineage views while they design or review flows.

2. Modeling complex workflows and agent teams


Agentic automations now look less like single prompts and more like graphs of collaborating agents.
Your builder should handle branching logic, parallelism, retries, and human-in-the-loop steps as first-class concepts.

Graph-style builders pair well with governed workflow hubs like Atlan, which can expose metadata, policies, and lineage to agents while centralizing approvals and reviews.

3. Integrations, tools, and context access


Most agents fail not because of reasoning limits but because they cannot reach the right data or systems.
Evaluate the library of native connectors, support for webhooks, and how easily you can wrap internal APIs into tools.

Many teams now route contextual metadata through a layer like Atlan so agents can safely query catalogs, glossaries, domains, and quality rules instead of raw databases.

4. Governance, security, and compliance


Agent sprawl without guardrails is a fast way to create security incidents.
You need RBAC, audit logs, approval workflows, and a way to scope which data and tools each agent can touch.

Platforms like Atlan increasingly act as a governance fabric across multiple builders, enforcing policies, lineage, and access control while still letting teams innovate locally.

5. Scalability, pricing, and ecosystem fit


Finally, check how pricing scales with runs, seats, or agents, and whether the tool fits your existing cloud and data stack.
You want something that can evolve from a single team experiment to hundreds of agents across business functions.

It is often cheaper and safer to pair a few best-of-breed builders with a shared governed context layer such as Atlan, rather than standardizing on one monolithic platform for everything.

Top 15 drag & drop agent builder tools

This list focuses on visual, drag & drop environments that support multi-step LLM workflows and agentic patterns.
Exact features and pricing change quickly, so treat this as a directional guide and confirm details from each vendor.

1. OpenAI GPT builder


What it is:
OpenAI’s GPT builder (and related assistants experience) lets you assemble custom GPTs and agents with instructions, tools, and knowledge.
The interface is oriented around configuration rather than pure canvas flows, but it has become a default starting point for many teams.

Best for:
Teams already invested in OpenAI APIs who want lightweight agents for support, knowledge retrieval, and internal copilots.

Strengths:

  • Deep model access and first-party features.
  • Built-in knowledge uploads and tools like code execution or web browsing.
  • Simple enough for non-developers to manage many use cases.

Limitations:
Not ideal for highly complex, multi-system workflows that require fine-grained orchestration.
Many teams pair GPT builder with workflow layers and governed context platforms like Atlan for end-to-end automations.

2. Microsoft Copilot Studio


What it is:
Copilot Studio provides a visual designer for copilots across Microsoft 365, Power Platform, and custom apps.
It combines conversational flow design, plugins, and orchestration with your existing Microsoft ecosystem.

Best for:
Enterprises standardized on Microsoft, especially where business users are already familiar with Power Apps and Power Automate.

Strengths:

  • Tight integration with Teams, Dynamics, and Microsoft 365.
  • Visual authoring of topics, tools, and approvals.
  • Governance that can plug into existing Entra ID and security controls.

Limitations:
Non-Microsoft stacks may find integration more complex.
Many data teams surface governed context from Atlan into Copilot flows so copilots understand data definitions, lineage, and quality rules.

3. Google Vertex AI Agent Builder


What it is:
Vertex AI offers an Agent Builder experience for creating conversational and task-oriented agents on top of Google’s models and cloud services.
The interface combines configuration screens with flow-based elements and tool wiring.

Best for:
Teams on Google Cloud who want to connect agents to BigQuery, Looker, and other GCP services.

Strengths:

  • Native GCP authentication and networking.
  • Integrated evaluation, monitoring, and safety features.
  • Strong retrieval and search tooling for knowledge-heavy agents.

Limitations:
Best suited to organizations already committed to GCP.
Many customers use a metadata platform like Atlan to provide a governed “map” of BigQuery and Looker assets that Vertex agents can rely on.

4. AWS agentic workflow studio (Step Functions + Bedrock)


What it is:
On AWS, agentic workflows often combine Step Functions’ visual builder with Amazon Bedrock agents and tools.
You design flows with states, branches, and retries, then plug in Bedrock models and custom tools.

Best for:
Engineering-heavy teams who want deep control over infrastructure, observability, and IAM on AWS.

Strengths:

  • Mature workflow engine with strong reliability guarantees.
  • Rich integration with other AWS services and event sources.
  • Fine-grained security and VPC controls.

Limitations:
More complex for business users; often needs engineering support.
Many organizations centralize context and governance in Atlan and expose that data to Bedrock agents through secure tools instead of direct warehouse access.

5. LangGraph Studio (LangChain ecosystem)


What it is:
LangGraph Studio builds on the LangChain ecosystem to offer a graph-style visual editor for agent workflows.
It lets you drag agents, tools, and control nodes onto a canvas and publish them as services.

Best for:
Teams already prototyping in LangChain who now need a collaborative, visual layer.

Strengths:

  • Native support for multi-agent, graph-like workflows.
  • Strong developer ergonomics and open-source roots.
  • Good fit for experimentation plus later hardening into services.

Limitations:
Still developer-centric; non-technical users may need training.
Many teams wire LangGraph to governed metadata via systems like Atlan so agents query trusted context rather than raw tables.

6. Zapier with AI actions and Canvas


What it is:
Zapier adds LLM steps and AI actions into its familiar drag & drop automation environment, along with Canvas for visual planning.
You can combine prompts, tools, and thousands of SaaS integrations without writing code.

Best for:
Operations, marketing, and revops teams building lightweight agentic automations across SaaS tools.

Strengths:

  • Massive catalog of connectors.
  • Simple visual flow builder that many teams already know.
  • Fast path from idea to working automation.

Limitations:
Not ideal for heavy data workloads or complex branching logic at scale.
Some customers surface trusted objects and definitions from Atlan via custom webhooks or APIs, so Zapier agents use governed concepts instead of free-form fields.

7. Make (visual automation platform)


What it is:
Make (formerly Integromat) offers a powerful canvas for automations, now commonly extended with LLMs and AI steps.
You connect modules, services, and decision points in a highly visual way.

Best for:
Product and operations teams that need flexible multi-step automations across many tools.

Strengths:

  • Rich visual editor with detailed configuration.
  • Strong scheduling and error-handling features.
  • Good support for complex branching and parallelism.

Limitations:
Can become intricate to maintain at scale without clear ownership and governance.
Pairing Make with Atlan helps teams understand data flows behind each scenario, with lineage and policies mapped to automation paths.

8. n8n (open-source automation and agent builder)


What it is:
n8n is an open-source workflow automation tool that now powers many agentic setups, especially when self-hosting is required.
Its node-based editor lets you drag and connect steps, including LLMs, tools, and custom code.

Best for:
Teams that want control over hosting, pricing, and extensibility, especially in regulated environments.

Strengths:

  • Open-source core with strong community.
  • Flexible expression handling and custom nodes.
  • Good fit for integrating with internal systems behind firewalls.

Limitations:
Requires more operational ownership than SaaS-only tools.
Some organizations connect n8n agents to Atlan via secure APIs or Model Context Protocol style bridges, so agents operate on governed metadata instead of ad-hoc queries.

9. Pipedream workflows


What it is:
Pipedream combines low-code building blocks with inline code, giving developers a fast way to compose agent workflows.
It is more developer-centric than some others but still offers visual flow diagrams.

Best for:
Engineering and data teams who want to script around agents while still having a visual overview of flows.

Strengths:

  • Strong developer experience with JavaScript/TypeScript.
  • Easy integration with APIs and webhooks.
  • Good observability and logging.

Limitations:
Less tailored for non-technical users or business stakeholders.
A governed context layer like Atlan can standardize which datasets and definitions Pipedream agents see, even when many flows are created by different teams.

10. Voiceflow (conversational agent design)


What it is:
Voiceflow is a visual builder focused on conversational experiences, including chatbots and voice agents.
It now supports LLMs, tools, and complex conversation logic in a drag & drop canvas.

Best for:
CX, support, and product teams owning chat and voice experiences across channels.

Strengths:

  • Conversation-first design, with clear paths and fallback handling.
  • Collaboration features for designers, writers, and developers.
  • Testing and prototyping tools for dialogues.

Limitations:
Optimized for conversational flows, not general back-office automation.
Connecting Voiceflow to Atlan helps ensure agents answer with governed definitions, policies, and product data instead of ad-hoc knowledge bases.

11. Retool Workflows and AI


What it is:
Retool offers workflows and AI blocks that blend backend tasks, UI components, and LLM steps.
You can orchestrate agents that both call APIs and power internal tools.

Best for:
Product and data teams building internal tools plus agentic backends in one place.

Strengths:

  • Tight coupling between workflows and admin dashboards.
  • Good support for databases, APIs, and authentication.
  • Rich debugging experience.

Limitations:
Primarily focused on internal apps, not public-facing agents.
Many Retool customers map their internal data landscape in Atlan so workflows and agents reference certified tables and metrics.

12. Bubble with AI and workflow plugins


What it is:
Bubble is a general no-code app builder with workflows and a growing ecosystem of AI plugins.
You can design UIs and backend flows visually, then insert LLM calls, actions, and tools as steps.

Best for:
Teams that want to ship full products or portals with embedded agents and automations.

Strengths:

  • Highly flexible UI and workflow engine.
  • Large plugin marketplace and community.
  • Good for MVPs that might later be hardened by engineers.

Limitations:
Complex apps can become hard to manage without strong structure and governance.
Some teams keep Bubble lightweight and rely on Atlan to expose governed data contracts and lineage that Bubble agents can call through APIs.

13. UiPath Studio Web and AI Center


What it is:
UiPath extends traditional RPA with AI-powered activities and agents in Studio Web and related tools.
You can drag activities, AI steps, and decision logic into flows that span UI automation and backend APIs.

Best for:
Enterprises with strong RPA investments that now want to add LLM reasoning and decision-making.

Strengths:

  • Mature RPA ecosystem and marketplace.
  • Strong orchestration, scheduling, and monitoring.
  • Increasing focus on AI and “agentic automation” patterns.

Limitations:
Often requires specialist skills and governance processes already used in RPA programs.
Many organizations are layering Atlan on top to bring shared metadata, lineage, and policy management into their UiPath-driven automations.

14. Cognigy.AI (contact center agents)


What it is:
Cognigy is a conversational automation platform for contact centers, now enhanced with LLMs and agentic patterns.
It provides a drag & drop conversation and workflow builder tailored to CX teams.

Best for:
Large contact centers and CX organizations standardizing on automated voice and chat.

Strengths:

  • Deep telephony and CCaaS integrations.
  • Visual design for flows, intents, and back-office tasks.
  • Enterprise-grade deployment, monitoring, and analytics.

Limitations:
Niche focus; not a general automation platform for all departments.
Pairing Cognigy with Atlan helps ensure agents use governed customer, product, and policy data, which is critical for compliance-sensitive interactions.

15. Tines (security-focused automations with AI)


What it is:
Tines is a security automation platform with a visual story builder that now includes LLM-powered actions and enrichment.
Security teams can drag steps together to triage alerts, gather context, and trigger responses.

Best for:
Security operations centers that want AI-enhanced incident workflows without writing heavy custom code.

Strengths:

  • Designed for security use cases and data sources.
  • Strong auditability and approvals.
  • Flexible mapping of alerts, entities, and playbooks.

Limitations:
Primarily focused on security and IT operations.
Some organizations centralize sensitive asset metadata and policies in Atlan so Tines stories can reference consistent ownership, lineage, and criticality tags across services.

Common use cases for drag & drop agent builders

Agent builders are less about novelty and more about replacing manual, error-prone work.
Most successful programs start small with one or two workflows, then expand across teams.
Below are patterns we see repeatedly.

1. Knowledge assistants and analytics copilots


Organizations build agents that answer questions about metrics, dashboards, and documentation.
These agents fetch definitions, explain reports, and link to relevant assets instead of forcing users to search manually.

When connected to a governed catalog like Atlan, these copilots can ground answers in certified metrics, lineage, and glossary terms instead of guessing.

2. Workflow automation for GTM and operations


Teams wire agents into CRM, ticketing, and marketing tools to summarize calls, create follow-ups, and keep records in sync.
Instead of a single “AI note taker,” builders coordinate multiple steps: transcription, enrichment, routing, and approvals.

Atlan can act as the reference layer for objects like customers, accounts, and products so automations keep terminology consistent across tools.

3. Data engineering and quality workflows


Data teams use agentic flows to watch pipelines, triage quality incidents, and propose fixes.
Builders can orchestrate anomaly alerts, generate root-cause hypotheses, and open tickets with contextual details.

With Atlan, these workflows can automatically pull lineage, ownership, and previous incidents to give engineers a complete picture before they touch production data.

4. Governance and compliance operations


Compliance teams automate policy checks, access reviews, and evidence collection.
Agents can read policies, inspect configurations, and assemble audit packs from many systems.

Linking these flows to Atlan’s governed metadata, policies, and domains lets agents reason about which data is sensitive, which teams own it, and which controls apply.

Selection checklist: choosing the right tool

A structured checklist will save you from cycling through endless POCs.
Use the questions below as a practical evaluation framework.
You can adapt this into your own scoring sheet or RFP.

1. Users, skills, and ownership model


  • Who will design and maintain agents: engineers, ops, or business users?
  • Does the UI feel approachable for those owners, or only for specialists?
  • How will you review and approve new automations before they hit production?

Many teams store ownership and domain context in Atlan so every agent and workflow has a clear accountable team and escalation path.

2. Depth of integrations and context access


  • Does the builder natively integrate with your warehouses, BI tools, and SaaS apps?
  • Can you easily wrap internal APIs into tools without a big engineering project?
  • How will agents access governed metadata like glossaries, domains, and quality rules?

A platform like Atlan can centralize this context, then expose it through connectors or MCP-style bridges to whichever agent builder you choose.

3. Governance, security, and risk controls


  • Can you restrict which data and tools each agent can call?
  • Are there human-in-the-loop checkpoints for high-risk actions?
  • How complete are logs, audit trails, and approval histories?

Governed context platforms such as Atlan give you a central place to define sensitivity, residency, and policies so you do not rebuild governance inside every builder.

4. Observability, testing, and lifecycle


  • Does the tool provide traces, metrics, and replay for debugging?
  • Is there a clear promotion path from dev to staging to prod?
  • How hard is it to refactor flows when models or APIs change?

Many organizations use Atlan to track which datasets and downstream analytics depend on each agent, so changes are coordinated instead of reactive firefighting.

5. Total cost of ownership and ecosystem fit


  • How does pricing scale with agents, runs, or seats?
  • Does the tool run where your data lives, or will you move data over the public internet?
  • Can you swap out one builder later without rewriting your entire governance stack?

Decoupling governed context in Atlan from the agent builders themselves helps future-proof your architecture while still letting teams experiment.

What most teams miss: governed context and workflow for agentic automations

Most conversations about agent builders focus on features and model quality.
In practice, context and governance are what separate one demo from a stable production rollout.
Without them, each new flow becomes a one-off experiment that is hard to trust.

Agentic automations need to know:

  • Which datasets are authoritative, deprecated, or experimental.
  • Which domains own which assets and who must approve changes.
  • What policies apply to each combination of user, use case, and geography.

If every builder encodes this knowledge separately, you get drift, conflicting definitions, and audit headaches.
That is why many organizations are shifting toward a governed context layer like Atlan that sits underneath multiple builders and tools.

In this model, builders focus on orchestration and UX, while Atlan provides:

  • A unified catalog of assets, domains, and products.
  • Lineage that shows where data flows before agents touch it.
  • Policies and classifications that agents can query before they act.

This separation lets teams try several drag & drop builders, retire the ones that do not scale, and still keep a single, governed source of truth for agents and humans.

How Atlan helps teams scale agentic automations safely

Atlan is not itself a drag & drop agent builder; it is the governed context and workflow fabric that makes those builders safe at scale.
It plugs into warehouses, BI, orchestration, and automation tools to create a shared metadata backbone for humans and agents.

For agent workflows, Atlan delivers:

  • Cataloged assets and domains: A single map of databases, dashboards, pipelines, and APIs that all agents can reference.
  • Business glossary and lineage: So agents ground responses in real definitions and understand where data comes from.
  • Policies and access rules: Central enforcement that travels with data, not bolted onto every tool.
  • Approvals and audits: Workflows that let teams review agent actions, especially for high-risk changes.

This governed layer lets you use whichever drag & drop builder fits your use case without losing consistency.
It also makes it easier to swap tools later without redefining policies or context from scratch.

Many teams are now adopting a multi-builder, single governance approach: experiment freely with UiPath, Zapier, or LangGraph, but centralize metadata, lineage, and approvals in Atlan.

Next steps: building your agent program with governed context

Drag & drop agent builders make it easier than ever to automate workflows and scale AI across teams.
But without a consistent governance layer, agent sprawl becomes a liability instead of an asset.

Here is a practical three-step framework:

  1. Pilot with one builder and one use case: Pick a single team and workflow that has clear ROI. Use your chosen builder to validate the pattern.
  2. Layer in governance early: Connect that builder to a governed context platform like Atlan so you establish lineage, policies, and approvals from the start.
  3. Expand across teams and tools: As more teams build agents, they can reuse the same governed catalog, glossary, and policies—even if they pick different builders.

This approach lets you move fast without creating ungovernable sprawl.
If you are ready to explore how Atlan fits into your agent program, book a demo to see governed context in action.

Share this article

signoff-panel-logo

Atlan is the next-generation platform for data and AI governance. It is a control plane that stitches together a business's disparate data infrastructure, cataloging and enriching data with business context and security.

Book a DemoStart Tour
 

Atlan named a Leader in 2026 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for D&A Governance. Read Report →

[Website env: production]