Snowflake Data Governance Best Practices: 5 Core Pillars for 2026

Quick answer: What are Snowflake data governance best practices?

Implement Snowflake data governance through five core practices:

1. Establish role-based access control (RBAC) hierarchy: Configure role hierarchy that mirrors your organizational structure.
2. Automate data classification with object tagging: Use key-value pairs for tag-based policy enforcement at scale.
3. Enforce security with dynamic masking and row-level policies: Protect data without blocking access or creating data copies.
4. Track data lineage and access history: Enable impact analysis and compliance audits through ACCOUNT_USAGE schema.
5. Monitor data quality with Data Metric Functions (DMFs): Run SQL-based quality checks natively in Snowflake for AI-readiness.

Below: What is Snowflake data governance, 5 best practices, When you need additional tools.

Get Gartner MQ D&A Governance Report →Take Atlan Product Tour

Without a proper migration strategy, many data catalog initiatives miss their objectives, often resulting in significant rework costs that can run into the millions of dollars. MIT’s State of AI in Business 2025 report found that around 95% of enterprise GenAI pilots fail to deliver measurable business impact. Snowflake’s Data Trends 2024 report found a 70%+ increase in the use of data-governance features year over year. Data catalog migration has two meanings in practice: migrating your catalog platform itself (moving from Alation or Collibra to a modern solution) or using a catalog to de-risk broader data migrations like moving to Snowflake or Databricks. Both require metadata-first planning and phased execution. Done right, catalog migrations typically take 3–6 months and materially reduce downstream data issues. You’ll learn how to assess your current environment, execute migrations in phases, and validate success through measurable criteria.

Snowflake Data Governance: Key Concepts

Term	Definition
Snowflake Data Governance	Framework for managing and controlling data within Snowflake AI Data Cloud using native capabilities like Horizon Catalog, RBAC, masking policies, and tagging.
RBAC (Role-Based Access Control)	Access control method that grants permissions to roles rather than individual users, enabling scalable security management through role hierarchies.
Dynamic Data Masking	Privacy technique that displays different views of column data based on the querying role, without creating data copies or requiring separate secured tables.
Object Tagging	Classification mechanism using key-value pairs attached to Snowflake objects (tables, columns, views) that enables automated policy application and governance at scale.
Data Metric Functions (DMFs)	SQL-based quality checks that run natively in Snowflake to monitor freshness, completeness, accuracy, and validity of data for AI readiness.

What is Snowflake data governance?

Snowflake data governance is a framework for managing and controlling data across the Snowflake AI Data Cloud using native capabilities built into the platform. The framework includes Snowflake Horizon, the built-in governance suite that provides catalog discovery, compliance features, security controls, and privacy capabilities. Organizations applied governance features 70% more in 2024 than 2023, driven by AI initiatives that require trustworthy, well-governed data foundations.

Governance differs from compliance, though they overlap. Compliance focuses on meeting regulatory requirements like GDPR or HIPAA. Data governance encompasses broader concerns: Who can access what data? How do you classify sensitive information? Can you trust this data for decision-making? What happens when a source system changes?

Snowflake Horizon Catalog sits at the center of the governance framework, providing:

Universal discovery across all Snowflake objects (tables, views, streams, tasks)
Automated metadata collection that captures structure, lineage, and access patterns
Tag-based classification that scales beyond manual approaches
Policy enforcement through RBAC, masking, and row-level security
Compliance tools including the Trust Center for audit and monitoring

The Snowflake governance ecosystem takes a partnership approach. Native capabilities handle governance within Snowflake excellently. When your data estate spans multiple platforms (Databricks, BigQuery, dbt, BI tools), metadata control planes like Atlan extend governance across systems while maintaining bidirectional integration with Horizon.

Why do you need data governance for Snowflake?

Without governance, your organization faces $9.7-15 million in annual losses from poor data quality alone, plus compliance violations that trigger substantial fines, and 95% failure rates for GenAI projects that can’t trust their training data. These aren’t theoretical risks. Four specific consequences emerge when you skip governance:

1. Financial hemorrhaging

Poor data quality costs organizations millions annually through bad decisions, failed initiatives, and operational inefficiencies. When your teams can’t trust data, they spend hours manually validating instead of analyzing, or worse, they make decisions on incorrect information.

2. Compliance catastrophe

GDPR violations carry fines up to 4% of annual revenue. HIPAA breaches trigger penalties plus reputational damage. Without proper data governance controls, you can’t demonstrate that you’ve implemented appropriate safeguards, documented data flows, or maintained audit trails.

3. AI initiative failure

Most GenAI projects fail because models trained on ungoverned data produce unreliable outputs. When you can’t verify data lineage, ensure freshness, or trust quality, you can’t deploy AI models to production. The companies succeeding with AI have governance foundations in place before starting model development.

4. Operational chaos

Data silos proliferate across business units. Teams create shadow IT solutions because they can’t find or access official data. Security teams discover sensitive data exposed in unexpected places. Nobody knows the authoritative source for customer counts, revenue figures, or product performance metrics.

Snowflake customers with proper governance see different outcomes. Snowflake reports nearly 150% growth in usage of governed data, showing that governance actually increases consumption rather than blocking it. When you implement proper controls, teams confidently use sensitive data because they know appropriate protections are in place.

What are the 5 core Snowflake data governance best practices?

Implement governance through five core practices built on Snowflake’s native capabilities: establish role-based access control hierarchy that mirrors your organizational structure, automate classification using object tagging that scales to thousands of assets, enforce security through dynamic masking and row-level policies that protect without blocking access, track data lineage and access history for impact analysis and compliance audits, and monitor quality with Data Metric Functions that ensure AI-readiness. Each practice leverages Snowflake’s architecture to provide governance that works at cloud scale. Full implementation takes 6-12 months, but you’ll see benefits from the quickstart path (RBAC, tagging, masking) within 2-3 months.

Best Practice #1: Establish role-based access control (RBAC) hierarchy

Without RBAC hierarchy, you’re granting permissions user by user, creating an unmaintainable mess where privilege creep becomes inevitable and security reviews take weeks. Configure a role hierarchy that mirrors your organizational structure—data owners who define policies, data engineers who build pipelines, data analysts who query for insights, and business consumers who access curated products. Start with Snowflake’s built-in system roles (ACCOUNTADMIN, SYSADMIN, USERADMIN, SECURITYADMIN) as your foundation, then create custom roles for specific domains, teams, or data sensitivity levels. Plan 2-3 weeks for initial setup that covers critical data and roles.

The key principle: Grant permissions to roles, never to individual users. When someone joins the finance team, you add them to the FINANCE_ANALYST role rather than copying 47 individual grants. When they leave, you remove the role assignment and all access disappears immediately.

Common RBAC patterns in Snowflake:

Functional hierarchy: DATA_ENGINEER → DATA_ANALYST → DATA_CONSUMER (each level inherits permissions from the next)
Domain-based roles: FINANCE_OWNER, MARKETING_OWNER, OPERATIONS_OWNER (isolates data by business unit)
Sensitivity-based roles: PII_VIEWER, PHI_VIEWER (grants access to sensitive data categories)

Here’s a basic role creation example:

-- Create domain-specific role
CREATE ROLE DATA_ENGINEER;
GRANT USAGE ON WAREHOUSE ANALYTICS_WH TO ROLE DATA_ENGINEER;
GRANT USAGE ON DATABASE PRODUCTION TO ROLE DATA_ENGINEER;

-- Assign to user
GRANT ROLE DATA_ENGINEER TO USER alice;

You’ll refine the hierarchy over time. Start with 5-10 core roles covering major use cases. Add specialized roles as patterns emerge. The role hierarchy becomes your primary governance control point—everything else in Snowflake (masking policies, row access policies, future grants) can reference roles, making governance declarative and scalable.

See how Atlan extends Snowflake governance across your data stack

Book a Demo →

Best Practice #2: Automate data classification with object tagging

Manual classification doesn’t scale—you’ll tag 50 tables, then discover 5,000 more that need classification, and your governance initiative stalls. Snowflake’s object tagging uses key-value pairs attached to databases, schemas, tables, columns, or views. Tag a column once as “PII,” and masking policies automatically protect it everywhere that column appears. This approach scales to thousands of data assets because policies follow tags rather than requiring manual attachment to each object.

The power comes from tag-based masking and tag-based row access policies. Instead of attaching a masking policy to 1,000 individual columns, you tag those columns with sensitivity classification, then create one policy that applies to any column carrying that tag. When new tables arrive with PII columns, you tag them and protection applies automatically. Plan 3-4 weeks for taxonomy design, tagging automation setup, and initial classification of critical data assets.

Common tag taxonomies:

Tag Category	Example Values	Use Case
Sensitivity	PII, PHI, CONFIDENTIAL, PUBLIC	Drives privacy policies and access controls
Domain	FINANCE, MARKETING, OPERATIONS, HR	Enables domain-based governance and ownership
Quality	GOLD, SILVER, BRONZE	Indicates data product tier and reliability for consumers
Lifecycle	PRODUCTION, STAGING, DEVELOPMENT, DEPRECATED	Controls which data pipelines and users should access

Snowflake partnered with metadata platforms to enable bidirectional tag synchronization. Atlan became the first partner to support two-way sync, meaning tags created in Snowflake flow to the catalog for business context, and classifications applied in the catalog push back to Snowflake to trigger policy enforcement. This closes the loop between technical governance and business understanding.

Build your tagging strategy around automation. Use Snowflake’s INFORMATION_SCHEMA to identify columns by name patterns (email, SSN, phone) for initial classification. Create tagging tasks that run on schedule to catch new objects. Integrate with your CI/CD pipeline so dbt models or Terraform deployments apply tags automatically. The goal is “tag once, govern everywhere” rather than continuous manual classification.

Best Practice #3: Enforce security with dynamic masking and row-level policies

Data exposure happens when you give users access to tables containing sensitive information they shouldn’t see. Snowflake provides two complementary mechanisms that protect data without creating separate secured views or copying data: dynamic data masking for column-level protection and row access policies for row-level filtering. Both operate at query time, meaning users see masked or filtered results automatically based on their role, with no performance overhead from maintaining duplicate datasets.

Dynamic masking displays different views of column data depending on who queries. A DATA_OWNER role sees full Social Security numbers (123-45-6789), while ANALYST roles see masked versions (XXX-XX-6789). The actual data never changes—Snowflake applies the transformation during query execution. You create a masking policy once, then attach it to columns directly or via tags.

Row access policies filter entire rows based on the querying role. A policy on the CUSTOMERS table might show FINANCE users only customers in their region, while EXECUTIVE roles see all customers globally. Like masking, row access policies execute at query time, keeping a single source of truth rather than creating regional views.

Feature	Dynamic Masking	Row Access Policies
Scope	Column-level (what data users see)	Row-level (which rows users see)
Use Case	Hide PII fields like SSN, credit cards, email addresses	Filter by department, region, customer segment, time period
Performance	Minimal overhead (evaluated per column)	Evaluated per query (typically negligible impact)
Application	Attach to columns or apply via tags	Attach to tables or apply via tags

Here’s a simple masking policy example:

-- Create masking policy for PII
CREATE MASKING POLICY mask_pii AS (val STRING) RETURNS STRING ->
  CASE 
    WHEN CURRENT_ROLE() IN ('DATA_OWNER', 'COMPLIANCE_ADMIN') THEN val
    ELSE 'XXXX-XXXX-' || RIGHT(val, 4)
  END;

-- Apply to specific column
ALTER TABLE customers MODIFY COLUMN ssn 
  SET MASKING POLICY mask_pii;

-- Or apply via tag for automatic coverage
ALTER TAG pii_tag SET MASKING POLICY mask_pii;

The tag-based approach introduced in 2022 changed governance economics. Before, attaching policies to hundreds of columns required scripting and ongoing maintenance. With tag-based policies, you tag columns once (manually or via automation), and the policy follows automatically. When new tables arrive with PII columns, tag them and masking applies immediately.

You’ll build a policy library during your 2-3 week security implementation phase. Start with policies for common scenarios: masking PII (SSN, credit cards, email), filtering rows by region or department, and protecting PHI in healthcare contexts. Test policies in development before production deployment. Remember that policies apply in real-time, so poorly designed policies can block legitimate access or create performance issues if overly complex.

Best Practice #4: Track data lineage and access history

You can’t assess the impact of changes or audit data access without visibility into data flows and usage patterns. When a source table schema changes, which downstream dashboards break? When compliance asks “who accessed customer PHI last quarter,” can you answer in minutes or days? Snowflake’s ACCOUNT_USAGE schema automatically tracks lineage relationships and access history, giving you query-based visibility into governance-critical information.

Object lineage in Snowflake captures dependencies between objects—which tables feed which views, which views power which dashboards. Query the ACCOUNT_USAGE.OBJECT_DEPENDENCIES view to understand impact before making changes. If you’re deprecating a source table, lineage shows every downstream object that depends on it. This prevents the “we broke finance reporting and nobody knew” scenarios.

Access history logs every query execution with details on who ran what query against which objects at what time. The ACCOUNT_USAGE.ACCESS_HISTORY view becomes your audit trail for compliance reporting. When regulators ask about data access patterns, you write SQL queries against access history rather than reconstructing usage from logs.

Here’s a basic access history query:

-- Find who accessed sensitive customer table
SELECT 
  user_name,
  query_text,
  start_time,
  rows_read
FROM SNOWFLAKE.ACCOUNT_USAGE.ACCESS_HISTORY
WHERE base_objects_accessed LIKE '%CUSTOMERS%'
  AND start_time >= DATEADD(day, -30, CURRENT_TIMESTAMP())
ORDER BY start_time DESC;

Snowflake’s lineage operates at the SQL statement level, tracking how data moves through transformations within Snowflake. This covers substantial ground—most analytics workflows run entirely in Snowflake via dbt, stored procedures, or Snowpark. The limitation: Snowflake can’t track what happens in external systems. When data flows from Salesforce through Snowflake to Tableau, Snowflake sees the “through Snowflake” portion but not the full pipeline.

This is where cross-platform lineage from metadata control planes adds value. Tools like Atlan connect lineage across systems—from source applications through Snowflake transformations to BI dashboards and ML models. For organizations running complex data stacks where understanding end-to-end data flows matters (especially for AI pipelines pulling from multiple platforms), the additional visibility justifies the investment.

Configure lineage tracking takes minimal time—Snowflake captures it automatically. The work comes in operationalizing lineage: building queries for common scenarios, creating alerts for suspicious access patterns, and training teams to check lineage before making breaking changes. Plan 2 weeks for setup and training.

Best Practice #5: Monitor data quality with Data Metric Functions (DMFs)

AI models trained on poor-quality data produce unreliable outputs, making quality monitoring essential for organizations building AI-powered products. Snowflake’s Data Metric Functions (DMFs) are SQL-based quality checks that run natively in your Snowflake warehouse, monitoring freshness, completeness, accuracy, and validity without requiring external tools or data movement. Introduced in 2024 (preview in March and GA later that year), Snowflake’s Data Metric Functions (DMFs) represent Snowflake’s recognition that governance extends beyond access control into quality assurance.

DMFs work like other Snowflake functions—you define checks in SQL, schedule execution, and query results from Snowflake tables. For example, a freshness DMF verifies that your daily customer table is updated within the expected window. A completeness DMF checks that required fields contain non-null values above your threshold. These checks run on your data where it sits, using your existing compute resources.

Common DMF quality checks:

Freshness monitoring: Last updated timestamp falls within expected window (detect stale data)
Null/completeness checks: Required columns contain values above threshold (typically 95-99%)
Range/validity checks: Numeric values fall within expected ranges, dates are reasonable
Custom business rules: Domain-specific logic like “total debits equal credits” or “active customers have recent orders”

Snowflake provides system DMFs for common scenarios (freshness, null counts), and you’ll create custom DMFs for domain-specific rules. The functions store results in Snowflake tables that you query directly or surface through partner tools. Atlan’s Data Quality Studio runs natively on Snowflake DMFs, providing business-friendly interfaces for data quality monitoring while keeping computation in your Snowflake environment.

Deploy DMFs incrementally. Start with critical datasets that feed executive dashboards or AI models. Implement freshness and completeness checks first (these catch 80% of quality issues), then add domain-specific validation rules. Schedule DMF execution to align with data pipeline runs—check quality immediately after transformation jobs complete. Plan 2-4 weeks for initial DMF deployment on your most critical datasets, then expand coverage iteratively.

The key advantage: DMFs run in Snowflake using native compute, meaning you’re not moving data to external quality tools or creating duplicate processing pipelines. This architectural choice reduces complexity and cost while keeping quality checks close to the data they’re monitoring.

How long does Snowflake data governance implementation take?

Plan 6-12 months for comprehensive governance covering your full Snowflake estate, or 2-3 months for a quickstart implementation that protects critical data and enables immediate AI initiatives. The timeline depends on data volume, organizational complexity, and existing governance maturity. A phased approach balances quick wins with thorough coverage, letting you demonstrate value while building toward comprehensive governance.

Snowflake Data Governance Implementation Timeline

Phase	Practices Covered	Duration	Key Deliverables
Phase 1: Foundation	RBAC setup, initial role hierarchy	2-3 weeks	Core roles operational, system roles configured, team members assigned
Phase 2: Classification	Tagging taxonomy design, sensitive data identification	3-4 weeks	Tag categories defined, critical datasets classified, automation configured
Phase 3: Security	Masking policy library, row-level security rules	2-3 weeks	PII/PHI protected, role-based data filtering active
Phase 4: Visibility	Lineage queries, access history monitoring	2 weeks	Audit capability operational, impact analysis queries documented
Phase 5: Quality	DMF deployment on key datasets	2-4 weeks	Quality checks running, alerting configured, dashboards created
Quickstart Total	Phases 1-3 (critical path for security)	2-3 months	Core governance live, sensitive data protected, AI-ready foundation
Comprehensive Total	All 5 phases plus refinement and expansion	6-12 months	Full governance maturity across entire Snowflake estate

The critical path runs through RBAC, classification, and security (Phases 1-3). These practices block the most severe risks: unauthorized access, exposed sensitive data, and compliance violations. Organizations typically implement this quickstart path before expanding to lineage tracking and quality monitoring.

Variables that extend timelines include: data volume (more data requires more classification effort), organizational complexity (more teams mean more roles and policies), compliance requirements (HIPAA/GDPR demand additional controls), and technical debt (migrating from legacy systems with inconsistent practices takes longer). Organizations with executive sponsorship and dedicated governance teams complete implementations faster than those treating governance as a side project.

Remember that governance is iterative, not a one-time project. Your initial implementation establishes the foundation. You’ll refine role hierarchies as team structures change, update tagging taxonomies when new data types arrive, and expand DMF coverage as more datasets become critical to operations. Budget quarterly review cycles to assess what’s working and what needs adjustment.

When do you need tools beyond Snowflake’s native governance?

Snowflake Horizon handles governance within Snowflake exceptionally well. You need complementary tools when your data estate spans multiple platforms (Databricks, BigQuery, dbt, on-premise systems), when business users need self-service discovery without SQL skills, when you’re building governed data products with contracts and SLAs, or when cross-system lineage becomes critical for AI pipelines that pull data from various sources.

Native Snowflake vs. Metadata Control Plane Decision Matrix

Scenario	Snowflake Native Suffices?	Metadata Platform Adds Value
Single-platform (Snowflake only)	✓ Yes—Horizon covers discovery, catalog, governance within Snowflake	Optional—primarily for UX enhancement and business user self-service
Multi-platform data estate	✗ No—each platform has separate governance, creating silos	✓ Yes—unified control plane for cross-platform governance and compliance
Technical users (SQL-comfortable)	✓ Yes—can query ACCOUNT_USAGE, configure policies via SQL	Optional—depends on scale of governance operations
Business users need self-service	Partial—discovery limited, requires SQL knowledge	✓ Yes—Google-like search, business glossary, non-technical interface
Data products with contracts	✗ No—Snowflake lacks data product and contract concepts	✓ Yes—marketplace, SLA tracking, consumer feedback, version control
Cross-system AI lineage	✗ No—lineage stops at Snowflake boundaries	✓ Yes—end-to-end visibility from sources through transformations to models
Automated governance workflows	Partial—can automate via SQL/Terraform	✓ Yes—visual workflow builders, approval processes, lifecycle management

The architectural pattern: Snowflake Horizon as the governance engine for Snowflake data, metadata control planes as the orchestration layer across platforms. Atlan won Snowflake’s 2025 Data Governance Partner of the Year based on bidirectional integration—tags sync between platforms, DMF results surface in business context, and lineage connects Snowflake to the broader data stack.

Be honest in your assessment. If 90% of your data lives in Snowflake, your analytics run via Snowflake SQL, and your users are comfortable with technical tools, Snowflake Horizon may suffice. Add complementary tools when you hit clear limitations: unable to discover data across platforms, business users frustrated by technical barriers, data products becoming core to your business model, or AI initiatives requiring cross-system lineage.

The joint customer base for Atlan and Snowflake grew 415% over two years, suggesting many organizations reach the limitations of single-platform governance as data estates expand. The decision point typically comes during scaling, not at initial implementation.

What are common Snowflake governance mistakes to avoid?

Most governance failures trace back to four preventable mistakes that delay implementations by 2-6 months, create security vulnerabilities, or undermine team trust in data. Recognize these patterns early to avoid the pain other organizations experienced.

1. Over-permissioning roles and granting ACCOUNTADMIN too broadly

Teams grant powerful roles like ACCOUNTADMIN or SYSADMIN to anyone who needs elevated access, creating privilege creep where dozens of people can modify critical infrastructure. When something breaks or data leaks, you can’t identify who made changes. The cascade effect: Once many people have ACCOUNTADMIN, they create more ACCOUNTADMIN users, and governance controls become meaningless.

Start with least privilege. Grant the minimum role needed for each function. ACCOUNTADMIN should go to 2-3 infrastructure administrators only. Most data engineers need SYSADMIN or custom domain-specific roles, not top-level access. Analysts need read access through consumer roles, not engineering privileges. Review role assignments quarterly and revoke unused permissions.

2. Manual tagging that doesn’t scale beyond pilot datasets

Organizations tag their first 50 tables manually, declare governance “implemented,” then discover 5,000 additional tables need classification. Manual approaches that worked for pilots fail at production scale. Governance initiatives stall when classification becomes a bottleneck, and sensitive data sits unprotected because “we haven’t tagged it yet.”

Invest in automation from day one. Use Snowflake’s INFORMATION_SCHEMA to identify columns by naming patterns (email, SSN, phone, card). Create tagging tasks that run on schedule. Integrate classification into your CI/CD pipeline so new dbt models or tables arrive pre-tagged. The goal is “classify once, protect everywhere” through tag-based policies rather than ongoing manual effort. Budget time for automation in your implementation plan.

3. Implementing governance after migration instead of before

Teams migrate data to Snowflake first, then try to retrofit governance afterward. This approach is 3-5 times more difficult than building governance into the migration. You’re tagging thousands of tables retroactively, redesigning RBAC while users already have access they shouldn’t, and implementing masking policies on data that’s already been exposed. Organizations that build governance before migration see much lower migration failure and rework rates than those that try to retrofit controls afterward.

Plan governance before migration. Design your role hierarchy, create your tagging taxonomy, and build your policy library during the planning phase. Apply governance controls as data migrates, not afterward. The incremental effort during migration is substantially less than the cleanup effort post-migration. Plus, you avoid the period where sensitive data sits unprotected in Snowflake.

4. Treating governance as a one-time project rather than iterative practice

Teams implement governance, declare success, then never revisit policies or classifications. Meanwhile, business needs evolve, new data sources arrive, team structures change, and compliance requirements shift. Six months later, governance is outdated and users route around controls that no longer serve their needs. The “set and forget” mentality leads to governance decay.

Build iteration into your governance model from the start. Schedule quarterly reviews of role hierarchies, tagging taxonomies, and policies. Monitor access patterns to identify roles that need refinement. Track policy violations to find gaps in controls. Assign data stewards responsibility for maintaining governance in their domains. Governance that adapts stays relevant; static governance becomes obstacles that teams bypass.

These mistakes share a common root: treating governance as a compliance checkbox rather than an operational capability. The organizations succeeding with Snowflake governance view it as infrastructure that enables secure, trusted data access at scale.

How Atlan approaches Snowflake data governance

The Challenge

Most enterprises manage data across Snowflake, Databricks, dbt transformations, and dozens of BI tools. Each platform has native governance capabilities, but they don’t talk to each other. Your Snowflake tags don’t flow to BigQuery. Your Databricks Unity Catalog policies don’t sync with Snowflake Horizon. Data lineage breaks at platform boundaries, making it impossible to trace data from source systems through transformations to AI models. Business users need to learn different discovery interfaces for each platform, and nobody has a complete view of data quality across the estate.

Atlan’s Approach

Atlan acts as a metadata control plane that orchestrates governance across your data stack while maintaining deep, bidirectional integration with Snowflake Horizon. The platform became Snowflake’s first partner to enable bidirectional tag synchronization, meaning tags created in Snowflake flow to Atlan for business context, while classifications applied in Atlan’s business glossary push back to Snowflake to trigger native policy enforcement.

The architecture keeps compute and storage in Snowflake while adding orchestration capabilities. Atlan’s Data Quality Studio runs natively on Snowflake DMFs, surfacing quality metrics in business-friendly dashboards without moving data or duplicating quality checks. Column-level lineage connects Snowflake transformations to upstream sources and downstream consumers, providing the cross-system visibility that AI teams need to trust their training data. Data products with contracts and SLAs let you treat curated datasets as managed products rather than ad-hoc table shares.

The Outcome

Austin Capital Bank reduced security gaps and launched new data products faster by implementing unified governance across their Snowflake and Databricks environments. Contentsquare unified more than 10 tools into a single governance plane, making data “simple and trustworthy” for their global teams. Workday built governed data products that enable their AI-native approach, with SLA tracking and consumer feedback loops built into the governance workflow.

The joint customer base for Atlan and Snowflake grew 415% over two years as organizations scaled beyond single-platform governance. Snowflake named Atlan the 2025 Data Governance Partner of the Year, recognizing the partnership’s impact on helping customers implement comprehensive, scalable governance that works across their full data stack.

Frequently asked questions about Snowflake data governance

What is Snowflake Horizon and how does it relate to data governance?

Snowflake Horizon is the built-in governance suite integrated into Snowflake’s AI Data Cloud. It includes Horizon Catalog for universal discovery across all Snowflake objects, compliance features like tagging and classification, security controls through the Trust Center, and privacy capabilities including data clean rooms. Horizon consolidates governance tools that previously required separate configuration, making them available to all Snowflake customers without additional setup. Think of Horizon as the governance control center for everything in your Snowflake environment.

How does Snowflake data governance differ from traditional on-premise approaches?

Cloud-native governance in Snowflake operates fundamentally differently than legacy on-premise systems. Snowflake enforces policies at query time automatically rather than through batch reviews, separates compute from storage to scale independently, and manages metadata centrally rather than across siloed tools. Traditional on-premise approaches required manual policy reviews, couldn’t scale to petabyte datasets economically, and created governance silos across business units. Snowflake’s declarative approach means you define a policy once and it applies everywhere automatically.

Can I automate Snowflake governance policies?

Yes, through multiple automation mechanisms built into Snowflake. Tag-based policies automatically apply to any object carrying the designated tag, eliminating manual policy attachment. Use Terraform or Snowflake CLI for infrastructure-as-code deployments that version-control your governance configuration. Schedule Data Metric Functions to run quality checks automatically after pipeline execution. Integrate with orchestration tools like Airflow or dbt to automate tagging during transformation workflows. Start with manual processes to identify patterns, then automate incrementally as governance matures.

What’s the difference between Snowflake data governance and data security?

Security represents a subset of governance, not a synonym. Data security focuses specifically on access controls, encryption, authentication, and threat prevention. Data governance encompasses security plus broader concerns like data quality monitoring, lineage tracking for impact analysis, compliance reporting, lifecycle management, and metadata enrichment. Governance answers questions like who can access what data, what does this data represent, can we trust it for decisions, and where did it originate. Both are essential, but governance provides the comprehensive framework.

How do Snowflake’s Data Metric Functions (DMFs) work?

DMFs are SQL functions that execute quality checks natively in your Snowflake warehouse using your existing compute resources. Define a check using SQL syntax, such as verifying a column contains fewer than five percent null values, then schedule execution frequency. Results store in Snowflake tables that you query via SQL or surface through partner tools. Snowflake introduced DMFs in 2024 to support both system functions for common scenarios like freshness and null counts, plus custom rules for domain-specific validation.

What is tag-based masking in Snowflake?

Tag-based masking links masking policies to tags rather than individual columns, enabling governance at scale. Tag a column with the PII classification, and the associated masking policy automatically applies protection. The benefit becomes apparent at scale—tag one thousand columns with a single classification action, and policies follow everywhere those columns appear. Compare this to traditional approaches requiring manual policy attachment to each column separately. Snowflake introduced this capability in 2022, and it quickly became the recommended governance practice for organizations managing hundreds or thousands of datasets.

How does Snowflake handle data lineage?

Snowflake automatically tracks object dependencies through the ACCOUNT_USAGE.OBJECT_DEPENDENCIES view, showing relationships between tables, views, streams, tasks, and other objects. Query this view to understand which downstream objects depend on any given table or view, enabling impact analysis before making schema changes. The limitation is scope—Snowflake tracks lineage within its own boundaries but cannot see relationships to external source systems, BI tools beyond Snowflake connectors, or other data platforms. For cross-system lineage, organizations use metadata platforms that integrate with Snowflake APIs.

When should I implement Snowflake governance—before or after migration?

Implement governance before migration, during the planning phase. Set up role hierarchies, design your tagging taxonomy, and create masking policy libraries before loading production data into Snowflake. Retrofitting governance after migration requires three to five times more effort according to industry consultants, because you’re tagging thousands of tables retroactively, redesigning access controls while users already have inappropriate permissions, and implementing protection on data already exposed. Organizations with pre-built governance reduce migration failure rates substantially compared to those attempting post-migration governance implementation.

Snowflake provides the building blocks for regulatory compliance through features like dynamic masking for privacy protection, granular access controls, comprehensive audit trails via access history, and geographic data residency options. You implement governance policies that meet specific regulatory requirements using these capabilities. Snowflake maintains platform compliance certifications including SOC 2, ISO standards, and HIPAA eligibility. Compliance results from combining Snowflake’s certified platform with your properly configured governance implementation, not from platform certification alone. Regular monitoring and policy reviews maintain compliance over time.

How does Atlan complement Snowflake’s native governance?

Atlan provides a metadata control plane that extends Snowflake Horizon across your complete data stack, not just Snowflake. The platform maintains bidirectional tag synchronization with Snowflake, meaning classifications flow both directions between systems. Atlan surfaces DMF quality results in business-friendly dashboards while keeping computation in Snowflake. The platform provides cross-platform lineage connecting Snowflake to dbt transformations, Databricks processing, and BI tool consumption. Snowflake recognized this integration by naming Atlan the 2025 Data Governance Partner of the Year. Consider Atlan when your data spans multiple platforms or business users need self-service capabilities.

What is the ROI of implementing Snowflake data governance?

Governance delivers ROI through cost avoidance and productivity gains. Organizations prevent losses from poor data quality, avoid substantial compliance fines like GDPR penalties reaching four percent of annual revenue, and reduce security breach risks. Productivity improves as teams spend significantly less time searching for and validating data with proper catalog implementation. Snowflake documented substantial growth in usage of protected data when governance enables secure access rather than blocking it. Typical payback periods run six to twelve months for mid-size and large enterprises implementing comprehensive governance programs.

How often should I review Snowflake governance policies?

Review governance policies quarterly at minimum, with monthly reviews recommended for rapidly changing environments. Trigger additional reviews when adding new data sources, responding to compliance requirement changes, observing shifts in access patterns, or investigating incidents. Governance operates iteratively rather than as one-time implementation—policies must evolve as business needs change, new regulations emerge, and data usage patterns shift. Assign data stewards to monitor their domains between formal reviews, automate alerts for policy violations, and schedule calendar reminders to ensure reviews actually happen rather than getting perpetually postponed.

What makes Snowflake data governance successful in 2026?

The five core practices—role-based access control, automated classification through tagging, security enforcement via masking and row-level policies, lineage tracking for impact analysis, and quality monitoring with Data Metric Functions—provide the foundation for secure, trustworthy data in Snowflake. Plan your quickstart implementation to cover critical data within 2-3 months, then expand to comprehensive governance over 6-12 months as patterns emerge and your team builds governance expertise. As organizations accelerate AI adoption, governance transitions from compliance checkbox to competitive advantage, enabling teams to move fast with confidence rather than choosing between speed and safety.

Snowflake Horizon excels at governing data within Snowflake’s boundaries. When your data estate expands across multiple platforms, consider complementary metadata control planes that orchestrate governance while maintaining deep integration with Snowflake’s native capabilities. The organizations succeeding with data governance in 2026 view it as operational infrastructure that enables innovation, not as bureaucratic overhead that slows teams down.

Explore how Atlan extends Snowflake governance across your data stack →

Share this article

Atlan is the next-generation platform for data and AI governance. It is a control plane that stitches together a business's disparate data infrastructure, cataloging and enriching data with business context and security.

Book a Demo Start Tour

Snowflake Data Governance: Features, Frameworks & Best Practices
Snowflake Data Quality: How to Scale Trust & Credibility in Your Data
Snowflake Data Catalog: Importance, Benefits, Native Capabilities & Evaluation Guide
Snowflake Horizon: Your Complete Guide
How to Set Up Data Governance for Snowflake: A Step-by-Step Guide
Data Governance Framework: Examples, Templates & Best Practices