Colorado AI Act: All You Need To Know To Ensure Compliance In 2025

Updated November 8th, 2024

Share this article

The Colorado AI Act (CAIA), signed into law in May 2024 and set to take effect in February 2026, introduces new standards for organizations that create and use high-risk AI systems in Colorado.
Unlock Your Data’s Potential With Atlan – Start Product Tour

CAIA is the first U.S. law requiring companies to ensure their AI systems operate fairly and responsibly, protecting individuals from potential harms.

This article explores the Colorado AI Act’s key provisions, its relevance to Colorado businesses, and strategies for compliance.

Table of contents #

  1. What is the Colorado AI Act?
  2. What happens if you violate the Colorado AI Act?
  3. How does the Colorado AI Act affect businesses?
  4. What makes you, as an organization, compliant with the Colorado AI Act?
  5. Bottom line
  6. Colorado AI Act: Related reads

What is the Colorado AI Act? #

The Colorado AI Act (CAIA), also known as Senate Bill 24-205, focuses on “consumer protections in interactions with artificial intelligence systems”.

CAIA sets guidelines for how AI technologies can be used responsibly by businesses and organizations, focusing on transparency, accountability, and protecting individual rights.

“On and after February 1, 2026, a developer of a high-risk artificial intelligence system (high-risk system) [should] use reasonable care to protect consumers from any known or reasonably foreseeable risks of algorithmic discrimination in the high-risk system.” - Colorado General Assembly on May 17, 2024

A high-risk AI system influences consequential decisions, such as those impacting employment, healthcare, or financial services, and mandates transparency, accountability, and consumer rights for such AI applications.

It’s important to note that the law applies to both companies that develop AI systems and those that deploy them as end users.

Why was the Colorado AI Act introduced? #


The Colorado AI act was introduced to address concerns about the rapid deployment of AI systems in sensitive areas without adequate protections against bias, discrimination, and privacy risks.

“A primary goal of the CAIA is to mitigate the risk of ‘algorithmic discrimination’ – any condition in which the use of an AI system results in an unlawful differential treatment or impact that disfavors an individual or group of individuals on the basis of their actual or perceived protected class (e.g., age, color, disability, ethnicity, national origin, race, religion, reproductive health, sex, or veteran status).” - FPF policy brief on the CAIA

By establishing regulatory requirements, Colorado aims to set a precedent in AI accountability, ensuring organizations take responsibility for the potential social and ethical impacts of their AI applications.

How is the Colorado AI Act different from the EU AI Act? #


While the EU AI Act applies broadly across different levels of AI risk, CAIA focuses specifically on high-risk systems, with a strong emphasis on preventing discrimination and ensuring transparency.

  • Geographic scope: CAIA applies within Colorado and takes effect in February 2026. The EU AI Act, by contrast, is a centralized law applying both within and outside the EU (when AI systems impact EU residents) and will come into force in March 2026.
  • Risk categories: CAIA defines high-risk AI systems based on their impact in areas like employment, education, and healthcare. The EU AI Act has a broader scope, including high-risk categories like biometrics, law enforcement, and democratic processes.
  • Penalties: The EU AI Act enforces stricter financial penalties, with fines up to 7% of annual global revenue for serious violations. CAIA’s enforcement is more specific to Colorado laws, typically involving fines and operational restrictions rather than globally impactful penalties.

What happens if you violate the Colorado AI Act? #

Violations of the CAIA can result in enforcement actions by the Colorado Attorney General, who has broad authority to ensure compliance. According to the Future of Privacy Forum (FPF), the Colorado AG may play a leading national role in setting AI governance standards.

Although the act does not permit private lawsuits, organizations that fail to implement risk management practices, disclose AI-related risks, or uphold consumer rights could face penalties, particularly if they neglect issues of algorithmic discrimination or fail to maintain proper documentation.

According to NAAG (National Association of Attorneys General), the CAIA can lead to penalties of up to $20,000 per violation.

How does the Colorado AI Act affect businesses? #

Businesses deploying or developing high-risk AI systems will need to implement comprehensive risk management practices, conduct regular impact assessments, and offer transparency on their AI system’s data sources and usage.

Specific duties are delineated for both developers and deployers, with developers required to provide technical documentation and impact assessment tools to deployers.

Additionally, consumer-facing AI systems must notify individuals of AI involvement if it is not apparent, with deployers required to offer consumers options for redress in cases of adverse decisions made by AI systems.

What makes you, as an organization, compliant with the Colorado AI Act? #

To meet the requirements of the Colorado AI Act, organizations need to implement clear practices and controls for managing and monitoring AI systems, especially those deemed high-risk. These can include (but aren’t limited to):

  1. Conduct regular evaluation of your AI models for fairness, transparency, and potential bias, especially in sensitive areas like employment and healthcare
  2. Maintain detailed documentation (or records) of your data sources, model inputs, and decision-making processes to provide an audit trail
  3. Outline and enforce transparent data handling policies that cover data collection, usage, storage, and access to protect consumer privacy
  4. Set up oversight and governance mechanisms to monitor AI and ensure that any biases or unintended consequences are identified and fixed right away
  5. Disclose the role of AI and provide consumers with options to request additional information or review
  6. Establish accessible channels that allow consumers to challenge or review decisions, ensuring fairness and transparency

Using a unified control plane can simplify CAIA compliance by centralizing data governance, documentation, and transparency across all AI systems with:

  • A central hub to store all metadata, policy coverage, and documentation associated with AI systems
  • Automated compliance management – audit trails, versioning, risk assessments, regulatory reporting
  • Data contracts embedded into the data producer tools and workflows – outlining the expectations, responsibilities, and quality standards for data usage
  • Automated, cross-system, actionable data lineage tracking
  • Granular access controls and privacy management (with auto-propagation of tags, labels, and policies via lineage)
  • Real-time alerts to notify relevant stakeholders about policy incidents and breaches as they happen

Also, read → The unified control plane in action | Metadata Management: Benefits & Use Cases

Bottom line #

The Colorado AI Act represents a significant step in U.S. AI regulation, establishing clear standards for companies developing or deploying high-risk AI. Compliance with CAIA is essential for businesses looking to responsibly leverage AI while upholding consumer protections.

Colorado’s approach could influence future AI regulations in other states, setting a precedent for responsible AI practices.

Share this article

[Website env: production]